|
The Phenomenon. Lone- or single-parent families,
primarily lone mothers are becoming an increasingly significant
family type in all the advanced industrialized countries (see Table
2.17a).According to Eurostat, lone parents are those who live
alone with their dependent children (Lehmann and Wirtz, 2004). Dependent
children are those under age 16 or 16-24 and living in a household
of which at least one of their parents is a member and who are economically
inactive (e.g. in education or training). Cohabiting couples, another
growing family type, are no longer counted as single parents, at
least in most countries.
According to Lehmann’s and Wirtz’s report (2004), lone
parenthood can occur as the result of a breakdown in either a married
or unmarried relationship that includes dependent children, or the
birth of a child or children outside a partnership.
Despite the dramatic rise in the rates of single-parenthood over
the last three decades, the extent varies across countries. In the
EU-15, 9 percent of all households with children are lone-parent
households (Lehmann and Wirtz, 2004). However, the range is from
22 percent in Sweden and 17 percent in the UK, to 4 percent in Italy,
Portugal and Greece and 3 percent in Spain. The average across the
10 countries reported in a US DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics study
(2003) ranges from a low of 8 percent in Japan to 26.5 percent in
the US in 2002 with an overall average of about 20 percent. With
only one exception, this family type is overwhelmingly female-headed,
with between 80 and 90 percent of the parents lone mothers. Only
in Sweden are 26 percent of these families headed by fathers.
In addition to these lone parents, a similar percentage of families
with children (about 20 percent) are cohabiting especially in the
Nordic countries, although the overall trend can be seen throughout
the EU (except in Sweden where these cohabiting couple families
are included among the married).
Lone mother families are at high risk for economic insecurity and
poverty; and the children in these families are especially vulnerable.
Child poverty rates in almost all the countries are disproportionately
high among children living in lone mother families. Nonetheless,
despite this, living in a lone mother family bears surprisingly
little relationship to the child poverty rate (Unicef, 2000; See
also, Kamerman et al., 2003). Other factors come into play, in particular,
maternal employment and government income transfers.
|
|
The Public Policy Response. Governments in all
these countries are being confronted by new needs and demands as
a consequence of this development, whether as a result of divorce,
separation, or never having been married – and despite the
decline in widows.
Maternal employment and government-provided income transfers are
both key factors in reducing child poverty in these families (Kamerman,
et al, 2003). In 2001, in the EU, just over 70 percent of lone parents
were working, most full time. Only in the Netherlands did more that
half the mothers work part-time.
| Country |
Lone mothers in Work |
Married Mothers in Work |
| France |
82 percent |
58 percent |
| Germany |
67 percent |
57 percent |
| Sweden |
70 percent |
80 percent |
| UK |
50 percent |
|
| US |
70 percent |
64 percent |
Policies responding to the income needs of lone parents include
policies that enforce the child support or maintenance obligations
of the non-custodial parent (as in the U.S.), policies that provide
an advance on the payment of support and a guaranteed minimum level
of financial support, trying to collect subsequently from the non-custodial
parent (as in several of the continental European countries), and
means-tested social assistance programs that provide income support
for low-income families, a large proportion of whom are lone-mother
families.
Different child maintenance policy regimes have been established
in the EU and in many of the OECD countries. In a study carried
out in the late 1990s, covering Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland,
France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, each country
developed its child maintenance policy from a different legal and
historical background; but the general trend has been towards equal
treatment of all children regardless of the marital status of their
parents (Corden, 2000). There has also been increasing emphasis
on the rights of the child, with the Nordic countries taking the
lead in this approach. In some countries this right is limited to
a child under a specified age (eg 6 or 12)
The U.S. , U.K., Netherlands and Australia are among the few countries
which have no specific scheme to advance child maintenance apart
from social assistance (TANF in the US). In Norway and Sweden, for
example, all resident parents may apply to the social security administration
to pay a fixed amount of support and to take responsibility for
collecting the payment.
|
|
The following tables are available to view and print in pdf format.
|
|
References
Kamerman, S.B., Neuman, M., Waldfogel, J., and Brooks-Gunn, J.
(2003). “Social Policies, Family Types, and Child Outcomes
in Selected OECD Countries”, Paris, France: OECD. Working
Paper.
Lehmann, P. and Wirtz, C. “Household Formation in the EU
– Lone Parents”, Statistics in Focus, Population and
Social Conditions, Theme 3-5/2004)
Martin, G. and Kats, V. “Families in Transition: 12 Developed
countries, 1990-2001”. Monthly Labor Review, Vol 126, No.9.
September 2003, pp. 3-31
Unicef Innocenti Research Center, Florence, Italy. Innocenti Report
Card # 1, June 2000. A League Table of Child Povtery in the Rich
Countries.
|
|
|
Last updated November 2004
|