|
(Last updated
October 2006)
|
|
Introduction and
Overview
Located in Southeastern Asia, the Philippines is an archipelago of
more than 7,100 islands situated east of Vietnam between the
Philippines Sea and the South China sea. Of the 7,100 islands that
form the Philippines, most of the land area is shared among the 11
largest islands. Covering a total area of 300,000 sq. km (116,000
sq. miles), its size is slightly larger than Arizona. Only about 460
islands are larger than 2.6 sq km (1 sq mi), and about 1,000 are
populated.
Claimed for Spain by Magellan in 1521, the Philippines were ceded to
the U.S. after the Spanish-American war (1898). They became a
self-governing commonwealth in 1935, but were occupied by Japan
during World War II.
The Philippines attained independence from Japan on 4th July 1946
after WWII. The first president Ferdinand Marcos ruled the country
for 21 years before a widespread popular rebellion forced him into
exile in 1986. Fidel Ramos was elected president in 1992 and Joseph
Estrada in 1998. Estrada was succeeded by his vice-president, Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo, in January 2001 after his stormy impeachment trial
on corruption charges broke down and widespread demonstrations led
to his ouster. Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was elected for a
six-year term to the presidency in 2004.
The Philippines is a democratic republic governed under a 1987
constitution. The government is based on a separation of powers
between the executive presidency, a bicameral legislature and an
independent judiciary.
The Executive: The head of state and chief executive of the
Philippines is a president, elected by popular vote to a
nonrenewable six-year term. The president may approve bills passed
by Congress or exercise a veto, which can be overridden only by a
two-thirds majority of Congress. The president nominates
appointments for heads of government departments, or ministries, to
form a cabinet. The Commission on Appointments, composed of 24
members of Congress, reviews and votes on the nominations. The
approved cabinet oversees the day-to-day functions of government.
The vice president, who is also directly elected, may serve no more
than two consecutive six-year terms. The president and vice
president are elected by separate ballot and may belong to different
political parties. The president has limited emergency powers and
may place the republic under martial law for no more than 60 days.
Legislature: The Philippines has a bicameral (two-chamber)
legislature called the Congress of the Philippines. The upper house,
or Senate, has 24 members who are directly elected. The lower house,
or House of Representatives, has a maximum of 250 members, 212
directly elected members representing districts and 24 sectoral
party-list members. Senators serve six-year terms, limited to two
consecutive terms and representatives serve three-year terms.
Judiciary: Based on US common law; the 1987 constitution contains a
Bill of Rights, and provides for a judiciary with the Supreme Court
at its apex. The Supreme Court has 15 justices appointed by the
president on the recommendation of the Judicial and Bar council and
serve until 70 years of age. Other judicial bodies include a court
of appeals, Sandigan-bayan (special court for hearing
corruption cases of government officials), and municipal courts.
For administrative purposes the Philippines is divided into regions,
provinces, and chartered cities. Philippine provinces are subdivided
into cities and municipalities. Unlike chartered cities, which are
accountable to the national government, cities and municipalities
are responsible to the government of the surrounding province. Each
provincial city or municipality is headed by an elected mayor.
The smallest unit of local government is called the barangay.
In rural areas the barangay is a village, and in urban areas it is a
neighborhood. Each city or municipality contains numerous barangays,
and there are thousands of barangays in the Philippines. Each
barangay is administered by a chief executive and a community
council, whose members are elected by the residents of the barangay.
The Philippines was less severely affected by the Asian financial
crisis of 1998 than its neighbors, aided in part by annual
remittances of $7-8 billion from overseas workers and no sustained
run-up in asset prices or foreign borrowing prior to the crisis.
From a 0.6% decline in 1998, GDP expanded by 2.4% in 1999, and 4.4%
in 2000, but slowed to 3.2% in 2001 in the context of a global
economic slowdown, an export slump, and political and security
concerns. GDP growth accelerated to 4.3% in 2002, 4.7% in 2003, and
about 6% in 2004, reflecting the continued resilience of the service
sector, and improved exports and agricultural output.
The Philippines have the economy of a developing country. In 2004,
the largest contributor to the GDP was services (53.2%) followed by
industry (31.9%) and agriculture (14.8%). The preliminary results of
the Philippine Labor Force Survey carried out in April 2005, by the
National Statistics Office of the Philippines Government, and
released on June 15, 2005 estimate that the number of persons in the
labor force (15 years old and over), who are either employed or not
employed, was 35.1 million. The labor force participation rate (LFPR)
or the proportion of working age population in the labor force was
64.8 percent (April 2005). The number of employed persons in April
2005 was registered at 32.2 million, translating to an employment
rate of 91.7 percent. Of the 32.2 million employed persons in April
2005, around 16.0 million (49.6%) were employed in the services
sector, 11.0 million (34.1%) were in agriculture sector and the rest
(16.3%) were in the industry sector. During this period, about 9.9
million (30.7%) were laborers and unskilled workers.
In April 2005 about half of the country’s employed workforce was
wage and salary workers accounting for 50.6 percent of the total
workforce. Own-account workers comprised 38.2 percent of the total
employed while unpaid family workers comprised the remaining 11.2
percent. The number of unemployed persons in April 2005 was recorded
at 2.9 million. This corresponds to an unemployment rate of 8.3
percent. Of the 2.9 million unemployed persons, 61.6 percent are
males while 38.4 percent are females. About 49.0 percent were young
unemployed, that is, those belonging to the ages of 15 to 24 years
old. There were 28.3 percent who were 25 to 34 years old. The rest
of the unemployed (30.0%) were 35 years and older. Of the total
persons not in the labor force, females (71.0 %) outnumbered males
(29.0%).
The United Nations Development Program estimated in 2003 that 14.6%
of the population lived in poverty (under $1 a day and 46.4% of the
population lived under $2 a day, near poverty). According to the
2003 Family Income and Expenditure Survey, the richest 30 percent of
families earned 66.3 percent of national income, while the poorest
30 percent received approximately 8 percent. Approximately 40
percent of the population lived beneath the poverty threshold of US
$365 per year in 2004. Poverty is more severe in rural areas, with
an estimated 49 percent of the rural population unable to meet basic
needs. This is double the Thailand poverty rate.
The World Bank estimated that in 2000, the female population in the
Philippines was 49.6% of the total population; female labor force
participation (as % of total labor force) was 38% and female
unemployment rate was 9.9% (slightly lower than the overall
unemployment rate of 10.1%). According to UNDP data, between 1995
and 2002 female employment (as % of female labor force) was 25% in
agriculture; 12% in mfg?? and 63% in services. In 2003, the Adult
Literacy Rate (percentage of those aged 15 and above) was 92.6% and
female Adult Literacy Rate was 92.7%. In the school year 2002/03,
the combined gross enrollment ratio for primary, secondary and
tertiary level schools was slightly higher among females (83%) than
males (80%).
Political participation of women has increased over the past decade,
more than in most developing countries. The percentage of seats held
in the lower house or single house by women increased by 8.8
percentage points between 1990 and 2004 from 9.9% to 17.8%. 12.5% of
seats in the upper house or Senate were held by women in 2004.
A variety of national executive orders and laws provide for the
welfare and protection of children. The Council for the Welfare of
Children (CWC) is the focal coordinating agency of the Philippine
Government for children’s concerns. Created through Presidential
Decree No. 603 (Child and Youth Welfare Code), the CWC is
responsible for coordinating and monitoring the implementation of
all laws, programs and services for children, as well as ensuring
that these are implemented within the code and the Philippine
National Strategic Framework for Plan Development for Children,
2000-2025 or Child 21.
The Philippine Strategic Framework for Plan Development for Children
or Child 21 is a strategic framework that guides stakeholders in
planning programs and interventions that promote and safeguard the
rights of Filipino children in the 21st century. The framework
weaves child rights (survival, development, protection and
participation) with the child's life cycle. It advocates not only
for a more focused targeting for children but also for interfacing
critical interventions at the various stages of a child's
development. It is considered to be both an important policy
development and policy innovation in the last decade.
As a strategic framework, it is not meant to be a comprehensive and
detailed plan. Rather, it paints in broad strokes a vision for the
quality of life of Filipino children in 2025. It is a road map for
the national government as well as for local government units,
private initiatives and non-governmental organizations in setting
priorities for action and in allocating and utilizing resources to
promote the rights of Filipino children.
Child 21 presents a shared vision for the Filipino child, crafted
from the inputs of all stakeholders in the development planning
process. It aims to synchronize family, community, and national
efforts towards the full realization of the rights of children by
2025.
The Plan presents strategic and programmatic frameworks that include
cross-sectoral strategies, as well as individual sectoral program
goals and strategies. The major goals of every program (health,
education, protection and participation) are outlined. These are the
road signs or milestones set forth for the medium and long term
periods, based on the development stages and evolving capacities of
the child (from the prenatal to adolescence period).
Institutional and implementation mechanisms will have to be put in
place to enable the integration of Child 21 in local development
concerns, through a short-term localizing process. A monitoring and
evaluation framework presents strategic and critical indicators. The
monitoring system mechanism will attempt to translate the country's
vision for the Filipino children into concrete, measurable impact
indicators within the context of child rights and a continuous life
cycle. They have endorsed the International Convention on the Rights
of the Child.
Return to Top
|
Government
Agencies
-
Bureau of Child
and Youth Welfare which ensures the care and protection of
abandoned, neglected, abused or exploited children, and
youth, delinquents, offenders, the disturbed, street
children, victims of prostitution and others, for social
adjustment and economic self-sufficiency.
-
Bureau of
Emergency Assistance which takes care of the relief and
rehabilitation of victims of natural calamities and social
disorganization and cultural communities and other
distressed and displaced persons.
-
Bureau of Disabled Persons Welfare which
implements programs and services for the prevention and
rehabilitation of the physically, mentally and socially
disabled persons.
-
Bureau of Family
and Community Welfare which provides assistance to socially
disadvantaged families and communities including family
planning, planning outreach programs to develop their
capability in defining needs and formulating solutions as
well as setting up viable community structures which bring
about desired social changes.
-
Bureau of Women’s Welfare
which promotes women’s welfare, with specific attention to
the prevention or eradication of exploitations of women in
any form, such as but not limited to prostitution and
illegal recruitment; as well as the promotion of skills for
employment and self-actualization.
Return to Top
|
Non-Government
Agencies
Neither the term 'third sector' nor 'non-profit sector' is widely
used in the Philippines. The term Civil society, in the Philippines,
refers to the whole range of non-state, non-profit organizations and
groups, including socio-civic organizations, professional
organizations, academe, media, churches, people's organizations
(POs), non-governmental development organizations (NGOs), and
cooperatives.
POs are membership-based organizations formed largely on a voluntary
basis (occasionally having full-time staff) function as
community-sector, or issue-based primary groups at the grassroots
(e.g. trade unions, environmental advocacy groups, peasant groups,
etc.). NGOs, on the other hand, are intermediate agencies and
institutions that tend to operate with a full-time staff complement
and provide a wide-range of services to primary organizations.
Cooperatives in the Philippines have a dual nature. Primary
cooperatives are membership-based and characterized more as POs,
while secondary and tertiary cooperatives (regional or national
federations providing support services to their primary members) are
considered NGOs. In addition, there are business and professional
associations, schools, hospitals and welfare societies.
There are two characteristics of non-profits in the Philippines that
may distinguish this community from others in Asia.
One, many non-profits have an advocacy and lobbying component as
part of their services, and in most of the non-profit categories,
there is at least one group whose main work is advocacy and
lobbying. Because of the fairly open policy environment in the
country since 1986, non-profits undertake lobbying work in many
levels (national government and local governments), and arenas
(executive and legislative). In many instances, these organizations
have 'won' policy successes.
Two, there are numerous professional organizations that exist in
most non-profit categories. In most cases, the associations are
established to foster unity and cooperation and to work for the
development and upgrading of the profession and the welfare of its
members. Others are formed for advocacy purposes so as to improve
public recognition and support of their professions.
Estimates of the number of civil society organizations vary-from
60,000 to a high of almost 96,000 registered non-profit, non-stock
corporations; apart from these are the 35,000 cooperatives
registered with the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA). The
figures for the registered organizations include the whole range of
civic organizations, business/professional and labor associations,
and religious organizations, most of which can hardly be considered
as strictly development-oriented, let alone active. There are also
an undetermined number of unregistered organizations.
There are 122 NGOs exclusively involved in delivering services to
children. A major organization in the category is: the ABS-CBN
Foundation Inc. (AFI) delivering services to children. There are
also Church organizations and other private foundations running
orphanage in close cooperation with government agencies.
Only a few development NGOs undertake programs and projects related
to youth services and youth welfare, although numerous social
welfare non-profit organizations implement small activities for
youth. National Council of Social Development Foundation of the
Philippines, Inc. is a peak body in the sector.
Apart from a few church-based organizations, there are not many NGOs
rendering family welfare services. Some NGOs with services to family
also cater to children and youth. Salidumay: Women's Voices Weaving
is an online community of various women's groups. [Philanthropy and
the Third Sector in Asia, 2005]
Return to Top
|
|
Demographic
Profile
The Filipino populations are primarily descendents of the Malayan
people who migrated to the islands thousands of years ago. During
the past several centuries, a significant number of people have
migrated from China. Some people of Spanish descent settled in the
Philippines during the Spanish colonial period (1565-1898). The term
Filipino originally described a person of Spanish descent born in
the Philippines. In the 19th century it began to refer to the
Christianized Malays who constituted the majority of the population.
Although the term remains closely associated with this group, it
also describes any citizen of the Philippines.
The Philippines had a population of 65,036,621 in 1990. The
estimated population in July 2005 was 87,857,473. The Philippines
has experienced declines in fertility, mortality, and
natural increase since the inception of the government’s formal
population program in 1969. But improvements in health and vital
rates have not been as rapid as some might have expected. The mean
number of children born to a Filipino woman during her reproductive
years (the total fertility rate, or TFR) fell from 5.8 in 1970 to
4.1 in 1990 and to an estimated 3.16 children in 2005, still a high
rate. Life expectancy at birth (both sexes combined) rose from
55.7 to 64.3 years over the 1970-1990 period and is presently
estimated to be about 69.91 years (2005). Thailand, by contrast, has
a TFR of 1.89. The OECD life expectancy currently is 74.7 for men
and 80.6 for women at birth.
The population is growing by about 2 percent a year (the population
growth rate in 2005 was 1.84 percent), giving the Philippines one of
the world’s highest population-growth rates. The high birthrate
contributes to a predominantly young population with a median age of
22.27 years (Thailand, for contrast, has a median of 30.5). In 2005
about 35.4 percent of the population was between the ages of 0-14
(Thailand 24 percent), 60.6 percent- between 15 years and 64 years,
and 4 percent- 65 years and above. The total dependency ratio was
68.5% in 2000.
The average population density is 295 persons per sq km (763 per sq
mi). However, the distribution of the population is uneven; some
areas are virtually uninhabited, while others are densely populated.
The percentage of the population living in rural areas has steadily
declined in recent decades. It decreased from 68 percent in 1970 to
57 percent in 1990. By 2002 urban dwellers outnumbered rural
residents, with only 60.2% of the population living in urban areas,
a rate estimated to increase to 69.2% by 2015.
Manila is the capital of the Philippines and the country’s chief
port, main commercial and cultural center, and largest city. Other
important cities include Quezon City, which is part of the Manila
metropolitan area, and served as the country’s capital from 1948 to
1976; Davao, a provincial capital and a seaport; Cebu, a seaport and
the trade center for a farming and coal-mining region; and Zamboanga,
also a seaport.
The Filipino population is generally divided along linguistic,
geographic, and religious lines. Different linguistic groups
developed as a result of the original settlement patterns. As the
Malayan peoples spread throughout the archipelago, they dispersed
into separate groups that each developed a distinct vernacular, or
regional language.
The primary religious groups are Christians and Muslims. Christian
Filipinos are the largest and most politically powerful group in the
Philippines. They live primarily in lowland areas, specifically
coastal areas and inland plains. They speak many different regional
languages and dialects and are categorized into ethnolinguistic
groups. Intermarriage and internal migration have helped to reduce
language barriers over the years. Muslim Filipinos, also known as
Moros or Moro Muslims, constitute the second largest group with a
common cultural identity, although there are many linguistic and
cultural differences among them. The Moros are of Malayan or
Indonesian descent and comprise ten major ethnolinguistic groups.
The upland tribal groups are the third largest cultural group in the
Philippines. The islands include more than 100 upland tribes,
ranging in size from 100,000 to fewer than several hundred members.
The members of the Aeta and Agta tribes are considered to be the
indigenous people of the Philippines. They are descendents of
perhaps the first humans who settled the islands during prehistoric
times, before the Malayan migrations. They are commonly known as
Negritos (a term assigned to them during the Spanish colonial
period) and are one of the world’s few remaining Pygmy people, who
are characterized by shorter-than-average height. Their communities
are located mainly on northeastern Luzon. Although most of them were
absorbed into the Malay population through intermarriage, some
retreated to the mountains as the Malayan settlers increased in
number. Those who retreated retained a hunting-and-gathering way of
life augmented by a type of nomadic farming known as slash-and-burn
agriculture, whereby they created temporary crop fields by clearing
and burning small areas of forest. Other upland peoples of Malayan
descent followed a similar settlement pattern. Through centuries of
relative isolation, these groups have preserved their traditional
ways of life and distinct cultures. They are engaged in subsistence
hunting, fishing, and farming. Most maintain indigenous belief
systems based on animism (the worship of nature deities and other
spirits).
People of Chinese descent comprise the largest non-Malay group,
making up about 1 percent of the population. Chinese people have
settled in the Philippines for centuries. They originally came as
traders, and during the colonial period they began to form an
important merchant class. They formed the first Filipino elite
during the colonial period, and today they continue to form an
economically and politically important minority.
In 2000, the ethnic composition of the Filipino population consisted
of - Tagalog (28.1%), Cebuano (13.1%), Llocano (9%), Bisaya/Binisaya
(7.6%), Hiligaynon Ilonggo (7.5%), Bikol (6%), Waray (3.4%), and
other (25.3%).
The Philippines has the only predominantly Christian population in
Asia, reflecting Spain’s colonization of the islands in the 16th
century. In 2000, the population consisted of Roman Catholic
(80.9%), Evangelical (2.8%), Iglesia ni Kristo (2.3%), Aglipayan
(2%), other Christian (4.5%), Muslim (5%), other (1.8%), unspecified
(0.6%), and none (0.1%).
More than 80 indigenous languages and dialects are spoken in the
Philippines. These languages and dialects belong to the
Malayo-Polynesian group of the Austronesian language family. The
most widely spoken are Tagalog, Cebuano, Ilocano, Hiligaynon, Bicol,
Waray-Waray, Pampangan, Pangasinan, and Maranao. English and
Filipino are the official languages.
Return to Top
|
Social
Protection
The Social Security System (SSS) is a publicly managed pension
institution (since 1959)responsible for providing social protection
to all private sector workers in the Philippines. The Social
Security Law provides that coverage in the SSS is compulsory for
all employees under 60 years of age. This law defines an employee
as any person who performs services for an employer and who receives
compensation for such services, where there is an employer-employee
relationship. Self-employed young persons can also be SSS members.
The mandatory social security program administered by the SSS
basically provides financial benefits to qualified members to cover
real life contingencies such as retirement, disability, death,
maternity, sickness and employment-related injury that may result in
income loss or financial burden.
In addition to the statutory pension, the SSS administers the
Employees Compensation (EC) Program for private sector workers. The
EC benefits are in the form of pensions and/or medical services.
Upon the death of an SSS pensioner, his primary beneficiaries as of
the date of retirement are entitled to continue receiving his
pension. If a retirement pensioner dies within sixty months from the
start of his monthly pension and is not survived by primary
beneficiaries, his secondary beneficiaries are entitled to a lump
sum benefit equivalent to the total amount of contributions paid by
the member and his employer, plus interest.
Disability Benefit
An SSS member who suffers partial permanent or total permanent
disability is eligible to receive a monthly pension if he has
contributed at least 36 monthly contributions. If the member has
less than the required number of contributions, heshe ? will receive
a one-time lumpsum payment equivalent to the monthly pension
multiplied by the number of monthly contributions paid to SSS or the
monthly pension times 12, whichever is higher. The minimum
disability pension is set at P1,000.
Upon the death of a totally disabled pensioner, his primary
beneficiary as of the date of disability shall be entitled to
receive 100% of the monthly pension. If a totally disabled pensioner
dies within sixty months from the start of his monthly pension and
is not survived by primary beneficiaries, his secondary
beneficiaries are entitled to a lump sum benefit equivalent to the
difference of 60 times the monthly pension and the total monthly
pensions paid by the SSS.
Death Benefit
The death of an SSS member who has paid at least 36 monthly
contributions entitles his primary beneficiaries to a monthly
pension. Beneficiaries of SSS members with less than 36
contributions are entitled to a lump sum benefit.
Dependent's Allowance
Upon a member's retirement, permanent disability and death, up to
five minor dependent children shall receive a dependent's pension
equivalent to P250 or 10% of the member's monthly pension, whichever
is higher. The dependent's pension stops only when any of the
following occurs: (1) the child reaches 21 years old, (2) the child
gets married, (3) the child becomes employed and earns at least P300
a day, or (4) the child dies.
Return to Top
|
Child, Youth
and Family Policy Regimes
Maternity Benefits
Every pregnant woman in the private sector, whether married or
unmarried is entitled to maternity leave of sixty (60) days in case
of normal delivery, abortion or miscarriage, or seventy-eight (78)
days in case of caesarian section delivery with benefits equivalent
to one hundred percent (100%) of the average daily salary credit of
the employee as defined under the Social Security Law.
To be entitled to the maternity benefits, a woman should be an SSS
member employed at the time of delivery, miscarriage or abortion;
she must have given the required notification to the SSS through her
employer; and her employer must have paid at least three months of
maternity contributions within the twelve-month period immediately
before the date of contingency.
Other than private sector employees, permanent or provisional house
helpers and self-employed persons earning 1,000 pesos (US$17.8) or
more in monthly income are covered by the Social Security Program.
Paternity leave is granted to all married male employees in the
private sector, regardless of employment status, (e.g. probationary,
regular, contractual, project-based) the purpose of which is to
allow the husband to lend support to his wife during her period of
recovery and/or in the nursing of her newborn child. The leave is
for seven (7) days, with full pay, consisting of basic salary and
mandatory allowances fixed by the Regional Wage Board, if any,
provided that his pay shall not be less than the mandated minimum
wage.
Paternity leave may be taken after the delivery, without prejudice
to an employer's policy of allowing the employee to take-up the
benefit before or during the delivery, provided that the total
number of days shall not be more than seven (7) days for each
covered delivery.
The employer advances the maternity leave benefit to the qualified
employee in full or in two equal installments, the first to be made
upon receipt of maternity leave application and the second not later
than 30-days after payment of the first installment. Upon receipt of
satisfactory proof of such payment, the SSS reimburses the employer
after the contingency for the amount of maternity benefit legally
advanced to the employee.
Return to Top
|
Early Childhood
Education and Care (ECEC)
Like many developing countries, the Philippines government has also
come to recognize the effectiveness of early childhood education in
offsetting primary school problems
such as a high rate of class repetition, early dropout rates, poor
learning, as well as poor health of youths and adults. In 1971, the
Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS) issued a
policy document encouraging the school division to establish public
preschool classes whenever possible. Since that time, public
preschools have been provided, adding to the many private preschools
already in existence. Unfortunately, there are no national data on
coverage and enrollment.
In January 1995, a survey was conducted to assess the preschools
implemented by DECS. One of the conclusions of the survey was that
Government could not afford to provide preschools in all parts of
the country. Thus, in March 1995, DECS issued a statement on early
childhood education which affirmed the importance of preschool but
stated that preschools were to be developed by the community to
provide early childhood development experiences for 4 to 6 year old
children before they entered Grade 1. In addition to community-based
pre-schools, the Department of Social Welfare and Development
operates day care centers for 3 to 5 year old children. However, it
is generally agreed that the quality of the day care centers is low.
In effect, there are two parallel systems of ECEC for 3 to 5 year
olds.
In 1999, the Philippine Government launched a five-year Early Child
Development (ECD) Project to attain the country’s human development
goals and to reduce poverty; as a strategy to meet the government’s
commitment to the international Convention on the Rights of
Children; and as a pilot for testing ECD structures and delivery
systems. ECD is part of a broader program to promote the development
of Filipino children and to address the great risks that children
from poor and disadvantaged families face.
In 2002, the government institutionalized the program by legislating
the Early Child Care and Development (ECCD) Act,which established
governance structures and delivery systems for children ages 0–6
years. It created the Council for the Welfare of Children (CWC) as
the highest policymaking body for children’s concerns.
The Council for the Welfare of Children (CWC) is the primary
Philippine government agency mandated, among others, to coordinate
programs and interventions among government and non-government
institutions that have a stake in the welfare and development of
Filipino children. The CWC serves as the coordinating council to
link agencies with programs and services for children. Its board
members include the Departments of Health, Education, Social Welfare
& Development, Interior & Local Government, Labor & Employment,
Justice, and Agriculture, National Nutrition Council, National
Economic Development Authority, CWC and three private individuals,
one of whom is a youth. It also has an existing functional network
with non-government organizations focused on children. To respond
more readily and strategically on the emerging issues that inhibit
the Filipino children from fully enjoying their rights, the Council
for the Welfare of Children coordinates Task Forces (TFs) and
Sub-Task Forces (STFs). Specifically, the Council has a Task Force
on Children in Need of Special Protection (TF-CNSP), which is
further divided into sub-task forces such as the sub-task force on
children in conflict with the law and the sub-task force against
commercial sexual exploitation of children.
The ECCD program’s overarching goal is to maximize the survival and
developmental potential of children, particularly those most
vulnerable and disadvantaged. It aims to minimize the health risks
to very young children; to contribute to the knowledge of parents
and the community about child development and encourage their active
involvement; to advocate for child-friendly policy and legislation;
to improve the ability and attitude of child-related service
providers; and to mobilize resources and establish viable financing
mechanisms for ECCD projects. The ECCD program set specific
quantitative goals, such as decreasing the child mortality rate and
increasing the proportion of children immunized. The program uses
health, nutrition, early education, and social services programs
that provide for the basic needs of young children.
It uses a multitude of instruments, among them a national child
surveillance and referral system; investments in essential,
child-focused services for parents, caregivers, and service
providers; expanded community participation and local ownership to
ensure sustainability; and the establishment of ECCD Coordinating
Councils at all levels of government to monitor implementation.
The program is an interdepartmental partnership of many national
agencies. Each has been assigned functions; representatives are
members of a national ECCD Coordinating Council. The program
recognized the need for a full partnership with local government
units (LGUs) and also with nongovernmental organizations. The
program components are as follows: a) Service delivery provides
support for provincial local government units (LGUs), which includes
an expanded program of immunizations , an integrated management of
child illness package, a malnutrition prevention and control
package, a parent effectiveness service package, and a Grade 1 Early
Child Experience(ECE)/ Early Child Development (ECD) package. This
component also finances facilities for municipal/city LGUs who wish
to invest in upgrading of their ECD services. b) Support to service
delivery supports the LGUs in implementing their investment packages
in the areas of communications, planning, targeting, management
information system, training, human resource development, and
institutional development. c) Research and development (R&D)
finances R&D activities needed to support effective ECD program
implementation, including initial piloting of new field-level
technical interventions.
National agencies provide counterpart funding for the establishment
and expansion of ECCD programs in poor and disadvantaged
communities. The ECCD Act explicitly allows resource mobilization
from intergovernmental donors and financial institutions for the
support of poor areas.
Return to Top
|
Child Education
Elementary and secondary education is free and compulsory,
but quality of education remains poor due in part to
inadequate resources. Public expenditure on education
increased from 2.9% of the GDP in 1990 to 3.2% of the GDP
between 1999 and 2001. 60.6% of this was spent on
pre-primary and primary education during 1999-2001 (but the
data are not disaggregated, and do not permit monitoring
pre-primary expenditures). In 2004, according to Department
of Education figures, the annual per pupil expenditure for
basic education was US$108 (P6,021).
Return to Top
|
Child
Health
The Republic Act No. 7875 enacted in April 1995 instituted a
National Health Insurance Program for all Filipinos and establishing
the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation for the purpose. The act
seeks to:
(a) provide all citizens of the Philippines with the mechanism
to gain financial access to health services;
(b) create the National Health Insurance Program to serve as the
means to help the people pay for health care services;
(c) prioritize and accelerate the provision of health services
to all Filipinos, especially that segment of the population who
cannot afford such services; and
(d) establish the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation that
will administer the Program at central and local levels.
In 2002, the total expenditure on health was 2.9% of the GDP, down
from 3.3% in 2001. Of this, government expenditure on health (as %
of total expenditure on health) was 39% and private expenditure was
61%. (OECD countries spend 8.5 percent of GDP, with government
providing 70-80 percent on average. In the U.S. health expenditures
constitute 15 percent of GDP; and of that amount, 44 percent is
spent by government.) The majority (77.7%) of the private
expenditure on health came from out-of-pocket expenses of patients
in 2002. This indicates a reliance on private funding that
perpetuates inequity of health care access and health care goals.
As of year 2002, the coverage of the National Health Insurance
Program among the total population stood at 49%,not unusual for the
developing world, but low for the industrialized countries. Increase
in enrollment and benefits to members have steadily grown since its
inception. Although much remains to be done in shifting the burden
of health financing to health insurance, some slight improvements
have been achieved in this area. The share of health insurance in
health spending has increased from 7.1% in 2000 to 7.8% in 2001.
According to government reports in 2004, 68.3 percent of children
were well nourished, and 64 percent were fully immunized. The child
mortality rate was 48 out of 1,000 children under age 5. In 2000, an
NGO estimated that 30 to 40 percent of preschool children in the
five-province Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao suffered from
malnutrition. According to the latest UNICEF data, at the end of
2001, nationwide 30.6 percent of children under age 5 were
moderately or severely underweight.
The Infant Mortality Rate decreased from 60 deaths per 1000 live
births in 1970 to 30 deaths per 1000 live births in 2003, a rate
currently achieved by China, for example. The rate for Mexico for
2002 was 21.4, but for Portugal it was 5. Under-five mortality rate
also decreased during this period from 90 deaths per 1000 live
births to 42 deaths per 1000 live births. In 2000, the Maternal
Mortality Ratio (adjusted) was 200 deaths per 100,000 live births.
In 2002 there were 1,738 hospitals (661- government and 1,077-
private) in Philippines. Though the number has remained unchanged
since 1996, the proportion of government hospitals has increased
(from 600 in 1996 to 661 in 2002) and the number of private
hospitals has decreased. In 2002, the number of local health
stations also decreased.
Return to Top
|
Special
Groups of Children
Child Labor
The
law prohibits the employment of children under the age of 15, except
under the direct and sole responsibility of parents or guardians, or
in cases in which employment in cinema, theater, radio, or
television is essential to the integrity of the production. The law
allows employment of those between the ages of 15 and 18 for such
hours and periods of the day as are determined by the Secretary of
Labor but forbids the employment of persons under 18 years of age in
hazardous or dangerous work. However, child labor remains a problem,
and a significant number of children are employed in the informal
sector of the urban economy or as unpaid family workers in rural
areas--some as bonded laborers.
The
most recent government survey reported approximately 3.7 million
working children, approximately 2.4 million of whom were exposed to
hazardous working environments, such as quarries and mines,
docksides, and fishing boats. The legal minimum age for employment
as a domestic worker is 15; however, an estimated 3.7 million
children 17 years of age or younger, including many under 15, were
so employed in 2004, compared with 4 million children reported in
2003. Apart from children in labor situations, the Government
estimated in 2004 that there were at least 22,000 street children
nationwide, although some NGOs believed the number to be much
higher. Welfare officials believe that the number increased as a
result of widespread unemployment in rural areas. Many street
children are abandoned and engaged in scavenging or begging.
Most
child labor occurs in the informal economy, often in family
settings, and the Government rarely seeks to prosecute a poor family
because it had a working child. Nevertheless, the Government, in
coordination with a number of domestic NGOs and international
organizations, implements programs to develop other, safer options
for children, return them to school, and offer families viable
economic alternatives to child labor. Although the Government has
made attempts to devote more resources to child labor programs,
resources remained inadequate.
The
Government and NGOs implemented programs to prevent the engagement
of children in exploitative child labor. The Department of Labor and
Employment (DOLE) works with domestic NGOs to educate communities
about child labor and provide counseling and other activities for
children. DOLE and the Department of Education works with NGOs,
UNICEF, and the ILO International Program on the Elimination of
Child Labor to assist children to return to school. The Government
also imposes fines and instituted criminal prosecutions for child
labor violations in the formal sector, such as in manufacturing.
DOLE continued its efforts to rescue exploited child workers,
rescuing 146 minors in 58 different operations between January and
September, 2004. The Employers Confederation of the Philippines
pursues an active and highly visible program against child labor.
Return
to Top
|
Child
Trafficking/Prostitution
Another objective of the current Policy of Defense and Democratic
Security is to eliminate illicit crops. The two main strategies
used to reach this objective are to the spraying of herbicides and
the substitution of crops. Within the substitution of crops
strategy the two main programs are the “Gamekeeper families” (Familias
Guardabosques) and the “Productive Projects” programs. The idea
of these programs is to provide an
alternative to these families so that they make a legal use of the
land from they can derive an adequate amount of income. The
“Gamekeeper families” provides a cash transfer and technical support
to families that live in areas of high risk of illicit crops. This
support is temporary and is supposedly to help the family reach a
level of economic sustainability from the new activity. As of
December of 2005 there were 33,137 beneficiary families of this
program (Departamento Nacional de
Planeación, 2005b).
The “Productive Projects” program, as it name indicates, are
productive projects in the agricultural sector that are co-financed
by the government, the private sector and the beneficiary families.
The objective for 2003-2006 is to enroll 27,000
peasant
families in
these projects. As of November of 2005, this program benefited a
total of 6,860 families (Departamento
Nacional de Planeación, 2005b).
Return to Top
|
Children with HIV/AIDS
The
first case of HIV was reported in 1984. The epidemic in the
Philippines has been classified as ‘low level’ with a prevalence
rate of less than 0.1% among adults. It is estimated that 9,000
people, of which 2000 were women, were living with HIV/AIDS in the
Philippines by the end of 2003. Less than 500 deaths were due to
AIDS by the end of 2003.
While
the Philippines has successfully kept the epidemic in check, an
active sex industry and a population of injecting drug users are
potential threats for the spread of the disease. The low prevalence
in Philippines has been attributed to a number of factors including:
circumcision, which reduces the risk of transmission; a culture of
sexual conservatism; geography- no land borders; relatively low
number of foreign tourists; low levels of intravenous drug use
although drugs do pose a problem.
The
Philippine National AIDS Council (PNAC) is the country’s highest
policy making and directing body on HIV/AIDS. The council members
represent 17 national government agencies including local
governments and the two houses of Congress, 7 non-governmental
organisations and an association of people living with HIV/AIDS.
The
Philippine National AIDS Council (PNAC) is the country’s lead agency
in the fight against HIV/AIDS. It coordinates and oversees programs
and activities that prevent and control HIV/AIDS in the Philippines.
The
centre-piece of the national response to HIV/AIDS is the enactment
of the Philippine AIDS Prevention and Control Act of 1998 (Republic
Act 8504), a model for HIV/AIDS related human rights legislation.
The entire process - the years of consultations, advocacy and
lobbying, has been hailed as a ‘best practice.’ [UNDP]
Return to Top
|
Children in Armed Conflict
Children are targeted for recruitment as combatants and
noncombatants by the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF); the Abu
Sayyaf Group (ASG); and the New People’s Army (NPA), terrorist
organizations involved in the Muslim and Communist insurgency facing
the country. All organizations involved in the insurgency continue
to recruit and use children both as soldiers and non-combatants.
Recruitment of children is due to a number of factors –
psychological; social tension; propaganda; and forced recruitment or
abduction. Armed groups target the emotional, psychological, mental,
or physical vulnerabilities of the children, as well as the
situations in their families or communities. Human Rights Watch
observes that children most likely to be recruited are: (1) poor;
(2) separated from their families; (3) displaced from their homes;
(4) living in a combat zone; and (5) with limited access to
education. They also come from communities, which have inadequate
social services.
The
International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC) reported that children
as young as 10 years were recruited by the MILF. It added that these
children were used as reserve forces and confined in camps for their
education. MILF policy, reportedly, allows the training of children
as young as 12 years old in their madrashas (religious schools).
Other estimates indicate that 300 to 500 women undergo training at
one camp between the ages of 10 to 16 years. Other than for
religious reasons, children are known to join the MILF because they
are promised a monthly salary, training and firearms. In most cases,
children are recruited into the MILF through their relatives who are
part of the organization.
The
ASG uses Islamic religion to draw minors into the movement. The
recruitment is conducted during religious festivities. The recruits,
mostly high school students, are promised a salary after training,
firearms, and even scholarship abroad. There have been reports that
ASG not only recruits children for combat, but uses them as human
shields, hostages, couriers and spies.
“Anyone who is physically fit, regardless of age, sex, race,
nationality or religion and has the capacity to fight and ready to
participate in a protracted armed struggle against the reactionary
state power, may be a member of a fighting unit of the New Peoples
Army.” – Point 1 of Principle III of the Basic Rules of the NPA
(1969)
In the
1990s, when NPA suffered a dramatic setback in membership, an
intense recruitment of children began. As of October 2000, at least
86 child combatants, between 14 and 17 had been captured or
surrendered to the government since 1999, by June 2000, the military
documented the recruitment of some 123 minors. The most celebrated
case was the capture of a 16-year old in an encounter with rebels in
April 1999. This provided strong evidence of the NPA’s recruitment
of children as combatants as a matter of policy.
According to military estimates, about 3 percent of the 9,000 to
10,000 regular fighters are children. In addition, around 20 to 25
percent of the new NPA recruits are children. An official from the
Office of the Presidential Advisor on the Peace Process estimated
that children made up as much as 19 percent of the NPA's fighting
force. The Council for Welfare of Children, in a July 2004 report,
estimated that children constituted some 13-18 percent of the armed
rebel combatants. These reports indicate that a large portion of the
NPA’s fighting force and new recruits are children. Children
recruited are mostly from poor families belonging to farming
families or school students. [Philippines Department of Labor, US
Department of State]
Return to Top
|
Note
*
Research and Reported by
Manita C. Rao |
References
Philippines (2005); The
CIA World Fact Book, Retrieved from the World Wide Web at
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/rp.html
Philippines, Republic of,
Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2005; Retrieved from the World
Wide Web at
http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761558570/Philippines.html#s1
Country
Profile: Philippines (2002)
; The Economist.com; Retrieved from the World Wide Web at
http://www.economist.com/countries/Philippines/index.cfm
UNDP; Philippines, Human Development
Report (2003); United Nations Development Program; Retrieved
from the World Wide Web at
http://hdr.undp.org/statistics/data/cty/cty_f_PHL.html
Philippines Labor Force Survey: Preliminary Results April 2005;
Income and Employment Statistics Division, Household Statistics
Department, National Statistics Office; Manila; Philippines;
Retrieved from the World Wide Web at
http://www.census.gov.ph/data/pressrelease/2005/lf0502tx.html
Philippines: Country Report on Human Rights
(2004); Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights
and Labor; US Department of State; Washington D.C. ; Retrieved from
the World Wide Web at
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2004/41657.htm
Philippines at a Glance (2005);
YOUANDAIDS : The HIV/AIDS Portal for Asia Pacific; United Nations
Development Program; Retrieved from the World Wide Web at
here.
Population
Trends: Philippines (1996);
Bureau of Census, Economics and Statistics Administration, US
Department of Commerce; Retrieved from the World Wide Web at
http://www.census.gov/ipc/prod/ppt92-11.pdf
Sustainable and Responsible Investment in Asian Emerging Markets
(2003); ASrIA Report, October 2003; Retrieved from the World Wide
Web at
http://www.asria.org/publications/lib/country/philippines.pdf
Philippines: Third Sector Overview
(2005); Philanthropy and the Third Sector in Asia and the Pacific;
Retrieved from the World Wide Web at
http://www.asianphilanthropy.org/countries/philippines/definition.html
Rights to
Social Protection: The Philippines Social Security System Experience
(2004); Social Security System
Economic Research Department, Manila, Philippines; Retrieved from
the World Wide Web at
http://www.issa.int/pdf/initiative/reports/2Philippines.pdf
Makinano, Merliza (2002); Child Soldiers in Philippines;
Featured Paper by International Labor Affairs Service; Department of
Labor and Employment; Retrieved from the World Wide Web at
http://www.childprotection.org.ph/monthlyfeatures/mar2k2a.rtf
Heaver,
Richard A. and Hunt, Joseph M. (1995); Improving Early Childhood
Development: An Integrated Program for the Philippines;
Directions in Development; A Collaborative Report by the World Bank
and the Asian Development Bank for the Government of the Republic of
Philippines; Retrieved from the World Wide Web at
here.
|
| |
|