|
(last updated January 2001)
|
Introduction and Overview (1)
New Zealand has no explicit family policy and its implicit family
policies resemble those of the other Anglo-American countries such
as Australia, Britain, Canada (the Anglophone part), and the U.S.
Family policy in New Zealand, according to Ian Shirley et al, has
to do with two major and several minor socio-cultural traditions
of family formation and organization which have confronted each
other since the first contact between the Europeans and the native
Maori in the late 18th century. Different patterns of inheritance,
adoption, and kinship were sustained in the face of colonialism,
high rates of intermarriage, and a different system of formal organization
leading to persistent tensions within the society, exacerbated further
by repeated waves of new immigrants, bringing in still other cultural
differences.
For many years, New Zealand was considered a social laboratory,
a small geographically isolated country, on the periphery of the
global economy. At the heart of its family policies were two developments:
the establishment of a family wage - a wage enabling a man to support
a wife and three children at a decent standard of living (and an
assumption that the wife remained at home to care for children)
-- coupled with full (male) employment. Shirley, et al state that
"This concept of a 'family wage' was at the center of New Zealand's
post-war development, and in that sense it comes closest to what
might be defined as a family policy"(2). The
family wage not only established a minimum income for the majority
of households, but it also protected wage levels and work conditions
and included provisions for sickness leave and overtime. Furthermore,
it complemented government provision of a free and universal system
of primary and secondary education, a community -based preventive
health system, a public hospital system, a government housing scheme
for those who could not afford a home of their own, and a selective,
residual, and somewhat punitive safety net for those who for one
reason or another, were not in the wage earning sector.
For a large part of the post-war period, New Zealand had full employment
and there was little need for its safety net. But in the 1970s as
a consequence of a declining market for its agricultural products
(in part as Britain became closer to the continent following its
joining the European Union), the oil shocks, the emerging global
economy and opening up of New Zealand's markets to other countries
-- full employment ended as did its family wage. And with the end
of these two social policy pillars, families' standard of living
began to decline, women's labor force participation rose in part
to protect that standard, and other family changes emerged. New
policies were imported, largely from the conservative, new right
in UK and the US. Families with children were especially vulnerable.
At present, its family policies are all narrowly targeted. Its universal
family allowance has been eliminated. Its social welfare benefits,
family support (its refundable tax credit), housing supplement,
community services card (a voucher for reduced fees for prescription
drugs), child care subsidies, and student allowances are all income-tested.
And with the couple as the unit for assessment, lower benefits go
to couples than to two single adults in a cohabiting relationship.
Finally, income-related fees were imposed in the 1990s with regard
to higher education, early childhood education and care (ECEC) programs,
and health care.
Return to Top
|
Highlights
Click here to view or print country
highlights in pdf format.
|
Government Agencies
The major government agencies with responsibility for social and
family policies include the Department of Social Welfare, Income
Support Service (ISS) which has responsibility for the various categorical
family benefits and delivers them through local offices; and the
Department of Inland Revenue, which administers the family tax credit
and the guaranteed minimum family income programs(3).
Regional health authorities administer medical benefits. The Department
of Education has responsibility for education and ECEC.
|
Demographic and Other Social Trends
New Zealand is a small country with a population of 3.8 million
including about 435,000 Maori. It is a relatively young country
with a demographic picture that is very similar to the U.S. Children
under 15 constitute 22.8 percent of the population and elderly 11.8
percent. Its fertility rate, at 2.0, is just about at the replacement
level. Like the U.S., it, too, has a high rate of immigration and
a large native minority population, in particular, Maoris, but also
a significant group of Pacific Islanders and Asians. It is a country
whose population and culture are based on a combination of immigrants
and natives. Its female labor force participation rate is lower
than the U.S. and similar to that of Australia or Portugal. Its
unemployment rate is at the OECD average at 6.5 percent, and about
the same for men and women. Its per capita GDP is about $18,000,
below the EU and OECD averages, a little lower than Australia and
substantially lower than the US.
In its early years, New Zealand experienced very high rates of
intermarriage between its predominantly male British settlers and
native Maori women, with very high fertility rates initially but
declining rapidly in the mid 20th century. It experienced a longer
baby boom following World War II than any other country. However,
it is now following the same demographic patterns as the rest of
the industrialized world: declining fertility, marriage, and remarriage
rates, and increasing divorce, later marriage and childbearing,
etc. Teen fertility rates which were very high have declined, but
still are high on a comparative basis. Teen out-of-wedlock birth
rates are especially high among Maori women, about 36 percent in
1991. Two-parent families were the standard for many years in New
Zealand and the unit around which family policies developed. They
have declined as a portion of families with children over the last
two decades yet still remain the most common form. There are a growing
number of two-parent families with no wage earner, however; and
growing numbers of lone-parent families, who constitute about 34
percent of all families with children if one includes those living
with parents or kin. Most are lone mothers, and most of these are
at home rather than in the labor force.
Return to Top
|
Social Protection
New Zealand was viewed as at the forefront of welfare state developments
right through the early post-World War II years. Its social security
act was passed in 1938 and includes the standard old age, survivors,
disability, and unemployment benefits as well as free and universal
education and health care. It enacted a family allowance in 1940
providing a cash benefit to all second and subsequent children,
and then covered first children the following year, making it a
universal benefit for all children in 1946. Since the 1970s, however
its cash benefits have become increasingly selective and income-tested
and benefit levels have eroded since the mid 1980s. With a welfare
state predicated on full employment and a family wage, and a sparse
and residual safety net, when the two basic pillars went, families
with children became especially vulnerable -- and very little was
available except through social assistance and tax benefits, and
these were meager. It no longer provides a universal family allowance.
Instead, since 1986 it provides a refundable tax credit, which has
replaced four earlier categorical benefits, all targeted on low
income families, a second family tax credit, a means-tested guaranteed
minimum income, and a means-tested social assistance benefit for
lone mothers.
|
Child, Youth and Family Policy Regimes
Maternity, Paternity, Parental, and Family
Leaves
New Zealand does not provide a paid maternity, paternity, parental
or family leave. It does provide an unpaid "parental" leave if the
parent has worked for the same employer for one year before the
expected date of birth (or adoption), and has been employed at least
10 hours a week(4). There are three kinds of
parental leaves:
- a maternity leave for 14 weeks including up to six weeks before
expected birth;
- a paternity leave of up to two weeks for fathers at the time
of birth or adoption; and
- an extended leave of up to 52 weeks (including 14 weeks maternity
leave) for either or both parents (shared sequentially) to care
for an infant or adopted child.
In addition, there is a special income-tested cash benefit for
single mothers payable at the sickness benefit rate, for three months
before and after childbirth. The benefit can be extended if there
are medical complications.
Return to Top
|
Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC)
(5)
Since the 1877 Education Act, education in New Zealand has been
free, compulsory, and secular. School is compulsory between the
ages of 6 and 16 and students may enroll and receive a free education
from age 5. All five-year-olds are in school now.
In 1986, all ECEC services including preschools, center-based programs,
and family day care were placed under one government department,
the Department of Education. This had a major impact on the programs,
stimulated growth, and led to the development of a special early
childhood education and training program for ECEC staff in university-level,
schools of education. The ECEC programs are funded largely by government
with income-related parent fees for some services and some free
programs. There has been an extensive increase in the supply of
these services during the 1990s and a recent increase in government
subsidies to improve quality in the areas of child:staff ratios
and staff qualifications.
ECEC programs include:
- Education and Care services, which are part or full day programs
for children from birth to age 5, under for-profit or non-profit
auspices , or as an adjunct to a business or organization. They
are the largest single form of ECEC services and constitute almost
34 percent of all licensed and developing programs. They have
doubled in numbers since 1990.
- Programs based on the total immersion of children from birth
to school age in Maori language, culture and values, which are
the second largest group, constituting 16 percent of the programs;
- and kindergartens, which are part day programs for children
aged 3-5, free and the third largest group and include 15 percent
of the programs.
- Other programs include parent managed and supervised playcenters,
supervised family day care homes (serving the under 2s especially),
programs serving Pacific islanders, and unlicensed playcenters.
There are also a separate cluster of family support services ("parent
support and development programs") many of which are also funded
by government, and which provide home visiting programs (eg HIPPY;
Parents as First Teachers), intensive social and health services
or links to these services, compensatory education.
Of the Education and Care Services, over half (52 percent) were
operated by for-profit providers, 37 percent are community based
and operated by non-profit providers, and about 10 percent are operated
by businesses, universities, etc.
Coverage is about 56 percent of children aged 0 to 5 in licensed
programs: 100 percent for 4 and 5 year olds , 90 percent of three
year olds, 51 percent of two year olds, 30 percent of one year olds
and 11 percent of infants under age one.
Maori children account for almost 19 percent of ECEC enrolments,
only slightly lower than the 22 percent of Maori children enrolled
in school at age 5. About 40 percent of these children attend the
special programs for Maori children..
The government is stressing improved quality for the programs,
and doing this by providing higher support for those improving staff:child
ratios and staff qualifications. Staff:child ratios in 1998 in the
ECEC programs were 4.8:1 across the age range 0-5 and 11.7:1 in
the kindergartens, for the 3-5 year olds.
About half of all parents wanting to use before and after school
programs say they cannot because they cannot afford the fees. And
many mothers who wish to take jobs, especially Maori mothers, sole
parents, and those from lower-income families also complain that
accessing quality, affordable ECEC is problematic for them because
of the costs(6).
Return to Top
|
Family Allowances
New Zealand no longer provides a universal family allowance as
it did in the past. It provides instead a series of income-tested
benefits described as "family allowances" including: a targeted
refundable tax credit for families with children under age 16 (Family
Support); another targeted tax credit for low-income families with
children (the Independent Family tax Credit); a special benefit
for persons caring for a mentally or physically disabled child at
home.
|
Child and Family Tax Benefits
The income tax unit is the couple. New Zealand provides two tax
benefits for families, both assessed on the basis of the couple,
and both targeted on low-income families with children: one is a
refundable tax credit described above (Family Support) and the other
the supplementary tax credit referred to above. It is unclear how
significant these benefits are in the family income package.
Return to Top
|
Other Child Conditioned Income
Transfers
New Zealand provides survivor's benefits for the children of a
deceased worker, a dependent's benefit for the child of an old age
pensioner, a special benefit for a disabled child, medical benefits
for dependents with an extra benefit for low-income families, a
social assistance benefit called the Domestic Purposes Benefit,
for low-income single mothers, and a means-tested guaranteed minimum
family income.
|
Child and Adolescent Health
New Zealand provides a national health service, with income-related
fees. There is no special health benefit for children.
|
Housing Benefits
New Zealand provides an income-tested housing benefit to low-income
families with children.
|
Youth
Twenty percent of school-aged children, aged 5-13 were enrolled
in after or out of school programs. Compulsory school ends at age
16. The youth unemployment rate is about 13 percent for both males
and females. There is a special youth unemployment benefit for those
aged 18-24 and a special youth disability benefit for 16-17 year
olds.
Return to Top
|
References
Ministry of Education, New Zealand, July 1998 Early Childhood Statistics.
Shirley, Ian et al. "Family Change and Family Policies in New Zealand",
in Sheila B. Kamerman and Alfred J. Kahn, eds. Family Change
and Family Policies in Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand, and the
United States. Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press, 1997.
|
Notes
- This section draws on Ian Shirley, et al. "Family Change and
Family Policies in New Zealand", in Sheila B. Kamerman and Alfred
J. Kahn, eds. Family Change and Family Policies in Great Britain,
Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. Oxford, Eng.:
Oxford University Press, 1997.
- Ian Shirley, et al. "Family Change and Family Policies in New
Zealand", in Sheila B. Kamerman and Alfred J. Kahn, eds. Family
Change and Family Policies in Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand,
and the United States. Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press,
1997. , p. 214
- Social Security Programs Throughout the World
- Shirley, et al Ministry of Education, New Zealand, July 1998
Early Childhood Statistics
- New Zealand Department of Labor and National Advisory Council
on the Employment of Women, Survey, conducted by Statistics New
Zealand, in 1998.
- Ibid.
Return to Top
|
Contacts
Washington Embassy
Embassy of New Zealand
37 Observatory Cir., NW
Washington, DC 20008
Phone: (202) 328-4800
Fax: (202) 667-5227
Ministry
Ms. Pam Phillips
Manager Operational Policy
Child, Youth and Family Services
Private Bag 21
Wellington, New Zealand
Phone: 011 644 918-9100
|
|
|
|
|
|