|
(Last updated August 2005)
|
Introduction and Overview
Iceland seems to be something of a modified Nordic model, with
an explicit family policy but with measures that are somewhat less
generous than in the other Nordic countries.
According to Eydal and Olafsson (2003):
Icelandic family policy has been fragmentary in nature and family
policy was hardly referred to in public debates until the 1990s
when it gained greater political attention. In 1994 (the UN's
Year of the Family), a proposition was put forth in a parliamentary
debate that called for a coherent body of family policy. Research
on families was also influential and promoted further debate and
policy making (see, Broddadóttir, 1994; Júlíusdóttir,
1993; 1995). In 1997, the Icelandic parliament, Alþingi,
passed a resolution on both the formation of an official family
policy as well as measures to be implemented that would strengthen
the position of the family (Alþingistíðindi,
1997:A, 1230). Parliament formally recognized the need for explicit
public family policy with this resolution (Júlíusdóttir,
2001).
In 1997 the Parliament enacted a resolution supporting the creation
of a public family policy to re-enforce the status of the family.
The basic premises of the policy are that the welfare of the family
is based on equality between men and women, that the family is the
setting for emotional ties both within marriage and within cohabiting
relationships, that family life is essential for the well-being
of children. Other aspects of the policy include statements concerning
protection of the family against violence, assuring families of
economic security, and ensuring the rights of immigrant families,
of the families of the disabled, and of the families of homosexuals.
The legislation requires the establishment of a Family Council with
responsibility for advising the government on family affairs, coordinating
the relevant activities of different ministries, and promoting research
especially with regard to the economic situation of families with
children. It stresses the importance of fathers being encouraged
to take parental leave.
Iceland is a country characterized by a relatively high birth rate,
a high rate of out-of-wedlock births, a high rate of cohabitation,
a very high rate of female labor force participation, and a very
low unemployment rate for both men and women.
Family policies include the specifics mentioned earlier, maternity,
paternity, and parental leave policies that are generous, but less
so than in the other Nordic countries and much less in the way of
early childhood education and care services. Cohabitation is treated
the same as legal marriage. In addition, in 1996 a law was passed
permitting two adults of the same sex to enter into a registered
partnership carrying with it some of the perquisites of marriage.
Iceland ranks 6th among the OECD countries in per capita social
spending, as a percentage of GDP, with only Canada, Ireland,
Luxemburg, Norway, and US spending more per capita. Family benefits and services constituted about 2.8%
of GDP in 2001, the lowest of the Nordic countries.
Table 1. Support to Families with Children in 1996-1997
|
|
Iceland |
Denmark |
Finland |
Norway |
Sweden |
|
Expenditure on Families with children, % of GNP
|
2,35 |
3,98 |
3,91 |
3,53 |
3,78 |
|
% of the nation under 16 years |
25,9 |
18,6 |
20,3 |
20,7 |
20,0 |
|
Transfer ratio= % expenditure/% of nation |
0,09 |
0,21 |
0,19 |
0,17 |
0,20 |
|
Source: Eydal & Olafsson,
2003, Table 1. |
During the 1990s, some significant policy changes
in the field of family policies have taken place and the Alþingi
accepted a parliamentary resolution on family policy. New laws on
the equal rights of both parents to paternity/maternity leaves and
the ratification of the ILO resolution regarding employees with
family obligations are two examples of changes that are results
of the family policy resolution from 1997. In the field of family
law, various changes have ensured that children have greater rights
to care from both parents, e.g. the possibility of joint custody.
Gender equality issues have also been high on the political agenda
and new laws on the Equal Status and Equal Rights of Women and Men
came into force. The day-care services have been radically improved
and the importance of day-care or playschools as the first stage
of schooling has been further emphasized by law. After School Services
have also been improved during the period in question. Childrens
rights have been enforced through different laws and the ratification
of the UN's Convention on the Right of the Child.
However, not all changes have benefited families,
e.g. during the period in question, there have been cut-backs and
reforms in the child benefit system and research on poverty shows
that certain groups among families with children are in a precarious
situation.
Even though the following statement has not been confirmed
by systematic research, the 1990s can be characterized as a decade
of the family because the importance of family and care related
issues reached in a more explicit way than before the political
agenda and policy-making. The overall generosity of public family
benefits was on the other hand reduced during the decade as it became
increasingly income-tested. Thus the total expenditures on those
benefits were lower at the end of the decade than at its beginning.
|
Social Expenditure in Selected Countries: 1995 and 2002 |
|
|
Denmark |
Finland |
Iceland |
Norway |
Sweden |
|
|
Percent of GDP |
|
1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
.. |
.. |
18.6 |
.. |
.. |
|
Families and children |
4.0 |
4.2 |
2.4 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
|
Unemployment |
4.8 |
4.6 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
3.9 |
|
Sickness |
5.8 |
6.8 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.6 |
|
Old age |
12.3 |
9.2 |
5.0 |
8.6 |
12.3 |
|
Disability |
3.5 |
4.7 |
2.2 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
|
Survivors |
.. |
1.2 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.9 |
|
Housing |
0.8 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
1.2 |
|
Other social expenditure |
1.4 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
29.1 |
25.6 |
21.9 |
25.8 |
31.3 |
|
Families and children |
3.9 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
|
Unemployment |
2.7 |
2.5 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
1.7 |
|
Sickness |
6.1 |
6.4 |
8.2 |
8.8 |
8.4 |
|
Old age |
11.0 |
8.4 |
6.2 |
7.4 |
11.7 |
|
Disability |
3.7 |
3.4 |
3.0 |
4.6 |
4.3 |
|
Survivors |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
|
Housing |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
|
Other social expenditure |
1.1 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
|
Note: PPP/euro per capita. |
|
Source: Nordic Statistical
Yearbook, 2004. |
Return to Top
|
Highlights
Click here to view or print
country highlights in PDF format.
|
Government Agencies
The major ministries for purposes of child and family policies
are: Ministry of Social Affairs and the Family Council within it,
the Ministry of Health; the Ministry of Social Security; the Ministry
of Finance; and the Ministry of Education and Science.
|
Demographic and Other Social Trends
Iceland had a population of about 289,000 in 2003 overwhelmingly
Lutheran as to religion. It is a small country, the most sparsely
populated in Europe. About 80 percent of the country is uninhabitable,
and the vast majority of the population lives in the coastal belt
area in the south or southwest. Iceland is a "young" country
with 23 percent of its population under age 15 and only 12 percent
aged 65 and older. Its fertility rate is high for Europe, at 2.0,
just about the replacement level, like the U.S. Its out -of-wedlock birth
rate is exceptionally high, at 65 percent. Its infant mortality
rate is low, at 2.6, and has declined steadily since 1986. Its unemployment
rate is very low at 2.3 percent in 2003 and its female labor force
participation rate is high, at about 83 percent.
Despite its high out-of-wedlock birth rate, 83 percent of children
under age 16 lived in families with two adults in 1998, 61 percent
in a husband/wife family, 22 percent with a cohabiting, not legally
married couple, and 17 percent with a lone parent.
Return to Top
|
Social Protection
Iceland is a Nordic country with a language and culture related
to that cluster of countries. Initially part of Denmark, Iceland
established itself as a modern republic in 1944 when 97 percent
of the population voted to be independent of Denmark. Since World
War II it has had an increasingly high standard of living, comparable
to that of the other Nordic countries, with a per capita GDP in
2002 of $29,400. National income rose rapidly after the War and
the national economy underwent dramatic changes, transforming itself
from a subsistence economy through rapid urbanization and other
features of industrialization. The quality of housing in Iceland
is higher than in most places, while the Icelandic roads are poorer
than in most countries with a comparable standard of living. The
latter is due mainly due to the size of the country and the sparsely
distributed population.
Social expenditures constitute 19.5 percent of GDP in 2003, far below that
of the EU average but the share going to child and family benefits,
at 11.7 percent, is significantly higher than the average.
|
Table 2. Social Expenditure in the Nordic
Countries 1950-1998 |
|
Year |
Iceland |
Denmark |
Finland |
Norway |
Sweden |
|
1950 |
6,3 |
8,0 |
7,1 |
6,5 |
8,3 |
|
1960 |
7,6 |
9,8 |
8,2 |
9,8 |
10,4 |
|
1970 |
9,9 |
16,6 |
13,4 |
14,7 |
17,8 |
|
1980 |
16,4 |
27,8 |
21,1 |
21,1 |
32,6 |
|
1990 |
18,0 |
30,0 |
26,0 |
29,0 |
35,0 |
|
1999 |
19,1 |
29,4 |
26,7 |
27,9 |
32,9 |
|
Source: Eydal & Olafsson, 2003, Appendix Table
1. |
Iceland has the prevailing social protection system of the Nordic
countries: old age insurance, survivor's benefits, disability benefits,
unemployment benefits, health insurance, workers compensation, family
benefits, and maternity benefits. All elderly are entitled to an
old age pension and all employees and the self-employed, to a second
tier, wage-related, occupational pension. Children are entitled
to both types of Survivor's benefits in the event of the death of
an
insured parent and full orphans receive a double benefit. Worker/s
compensation and unemployment insurance both carry entitlement to
dependents' benefits as well.
Single parents enjoy special support in various areas (MISSOC,
2003). There is a special single parent allowance and childcare
is subsided both centers, family day care homes, for single parents.
Return to Top
|
Child, Youth and Family Policy Regimes
Maternity, Paternity, Parental, and Family
Leaves
Maternity/Paternity and Parental Leaves refer to leaves at the
time of childbirth, adoption, or the taking of a child under age
8 into foster care.
A new act in maternity, paternity, and parental benefits and leaves
was enacted in 2001. Benefits are provided following childbirth
to parents who have worked for a least 6 consecutive months before
claiming the benefits.
Eligibility criteria for a parental leave is at least 6 months
prior employment before beginning the leave, and for new residents,
at least 12 months of residence in the country.
Each parent is entitled to a three-month maternity/paternity
leave following birth or adoption but a woman can begin her leave one month before
expected birth and each parent can take an additional 3 months for an
unpaid parental leave of 12 months in total (6 paid and 6 unpaid), which must be taken
by when the child
reaches the age of 18 months. In the case of adoption, the leave
begins either when the child enters the parents' home or, if parents
must travel to collect the child, when the travel begins. In the
case of multiple births the leave can be extended by an additional
three months; or in the case of the baby's illness or the mother's
illness, it can be extended accordingly. The mother must take at
least two weeks leave after birth. While on maternity/paternity
leave parents are entitled to a cash benefit replacing 80 percent
of their prior wages. In the case of a non-working, at-home parent,
a minimum benefit is provided. The 12-month leave may be spread
out over the first 18 months after birth, but must be completed
within that period. Cash benefits are included in taxable income.
Sick child leave permits a parent to stay at home to care for a
child under age 13, for up to 13 weeks, without loss of income.
The Icelandic Act on Maternity/Paternity Leave and Parental Leave
is targeted at the working and unemployed parents, and parents attending
full-time educational programs.
The aim of this Act is to ensure children's access to both their
fathers and mothers. Furthermore, the aim of this Act is to enable
both women and men to co-ordinate family life and work outside the
home.
Unemployed parents
have the same rights to parental leave, but the benefit level is
lower. Employees have the right to return either to their job after
having had a leave, or to the same kind and level of job.
The Minister of Social Affairs is in overall charge of maternity/paternity
leave. All payments to parents are handled by Maternity/Paternity
Leave Fund that is managed by the State Social Security Institute.
The Maternity/Paternity Leave Fund is financed through the collection
of an insurance levy in addition to interest on the Fund's deposits.
Regarding parental leave (to take care of sick child), the Act
reads (Eydal & Olafsson, 2003):
Parents are entitled to parental leave for 13 weeks to care for
their children; the right to a parental leave will terminate when
the child reaches the age of eight years; each parent shall have
an independent right to parental leave, which shall not be assignable;
parental leave shall not be accompanied by payment from the Maternity/Paternity
Leave Fund; a parent shall have the right to take parental leave
in one continuous period; however, the employee shall be permitted
to make other arrangements with his/her employer for the parental
leave to be divided into number of periods.
In both cases (maternity/paternity leave and parental leave)
the employee shall be entitled to return to her/his job upon the
completion of maternity/paternity leave or parental leave, or
if this not possible, she/he shall be entitled to a comparable
position.
Excerpted and adapted from: Act on Maternity/Paternity Leave
and Parental Leave, Icelandic Ministry of Social Affairs, 2000.
|
Table 3. Overview
of Maternity/Paternity/Parental Leave
In Iceland Year
2001-3 |
|
Age of child
|
Type of
leave/Period |
Payment
|
|
Less than 18 months
|
Paternity/Maternity
leave:
3 months maternity
leave;
3 months paternity
leave;
3 months divided as
the parent choose
|
For parents
participating in
Labor market; 80% of
all
pay- for other
parents
flat rate payments
|
|
18 months – 8 years
|
Parental leave:
13 weeks for mothers
13 weeks for fathers
|
No payments
|
|
Source: Eydal & Olafsson, 2003, Table 6. |
Return to Top
|
Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC)
Compulsory school begins at age 6 and ends at age 16. Preschool
is for children under age 6, is administered by the Ministry of
Culture and Education, and is delivered largely by the public sector.
The core philosophy is that the programs are to integrate care and
education. In 1999, 57 percent of children aged 0-5 were enrolled
in full day, full year care, 86 percent of the 3-5 year olds and
42 percent of those under age three. Parents pay income-related
fees, amounting to about 32 percent of operating costs. Coverage
has increased dramatically over the last decade, from 42 percent
over all in 1990 (73 percent of the 3-5 year olds and 14 percent
of the under 3s). Shortages exist for the infant/toddler programs,
and some parents use informal family day care as a result; but the
preference is for center care. Most local authorities provide non-means-tested
subsidies to single parents to pay for private childcare.
|
Table 4. Children
in Iceland Age 0-6 Years Enrolled in Public Day-Care
(Institutions and Family Care) Percentage of All
Children in the
Age Group 1990-2000 |
|
Age: |
0-1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Total |
|
1990 |
3,6 |
19,8 |
49,5 |
78,3 |
81,7 |
72,3 |
3,0 |
42,9 |
|
1991 |
4,9 |
21,3 |
49,2 |
76,4 |
80,9 |
81,0 |
3,2 |
44,4 |
|
1992 |
3,6 |
20,2 |
46,6 |
75,9 |
81,7 |
74,0 |
3,4 |
44,5 |
|
1993 |
4,2 |
22,1 |
53,8 |
77,9 |
81,5 |
74,8 |
2,7 |
46,3 |
|
1994 |
3,9 |
25,4 |
64,3 |
82,1 |
85,2 |
78,6 |
2,7 |
49,6 |
|
1995 |
4,7 |
32,3 |
69,2 |
85,0 |
87,5 |
80,8 |
2,4 |
52,9 |
|
1996 |
4,8 |
35,2 |
70,0 |
85,5 |
87,8 |
86,2 |
0,1 |
53,4 |
|
1997 |
5,5 |
37,4 |
73,5 |
87,7 |
90,6 |
86,5 |
0,6 |
55,6 |
|
1998 |
6,9 |
40,9 |
77,4 |
89,6 |
92,7 |
89,6 |
0,2 |
57,5 |
|
1999 |
7,3 |
43,9 |
76,1 |
90,1 |
92,1 |
90,6 |
0,1 |
57,7 |
|
2000 |
6,5 |
43,9 |
73,0 |
91,9 |
93,0 |
92,1 |
0,3 |
57,5 |
|
Source: Eydal
& Olafsson, 2003, Table 5 |
|
Family and Child Allowances
Family (child) allowances for children under age 16 have recently
been transferred to the tax system for administrative purposes.
Child allowances are universal for all children under age 7, means-tested
for older children, and are paid to the child of a deceased parent,
or a parent receiving disability benefits, or of a single parent.
Child allowances are higher for children under age 7 than for older
children. Children must be Iceland residents. The annual child
benefit award in 2004 was IK 36,308 for a child under age 7 during
2003. In addition, there is a child conditioned tax allowance per
child (SSPTW, 2004).
A single parent allowance of 67 Euros per month is paid to parents
with a child under age 18; and the foster family allowance is higher
for lone parents with a child. A home care allowance is available
for parents with a disabled or chronically ill child.
|
Child and Family Tax Benefits
General family benefits are granted as tax reduction (see above).
|
Child Support
A minimum child support benefit is guaranteed to children and paid
in advance by the government when the non-custodial parent does
not pay it or pays it at an inadequate level. If the child is in
school, the payment may be provided until the child is 20 years
old. All children aged 12 and older have the right to have their
wishes taken into account with regard to custody.
|
Other Child Conditioned Income
Transfers
All social insurance benefits carry with them either a dependent's
benefit (disability benefits, unemployment benefit) or a special
benefit. Thus there are survivors' benefits associated with old
age pensions (orphan allowances, which are doubled in the case of
a full orphan), disability pensions, worker's compensation. A home
care allowance up to a fixed amount may be paid to parent caring
for a disabled or chronically ill child.
There are no school fees but parents pay for school meals and after
school programs.
Reconciling Work and Family
In addition to the big changes that have taken place in public
family policies, there has also been a radical ongoing change
aiming at a reconciliation of job and family from both the perspective
of employees in the private and public sectors (Eydal & Olafsson,
2003). According to the Act on the Equal Status and Equal Rights
of Women and Men, companies and institutions that employ more
than 25 people shall prepare a program on equality, which shall
include specific provisions on gender equality in their personnel
policy (Cf. Act on the Equal Status and Equal Rights of Women
and Men no. 96/2000). Similarly, companies have formed family
policies or family friendly employment policies. An example of
such change is a project called Striking the Balance
(Hið gullna jafnvægi) where partners from the
private sector, Reykjavik City and Gallup Iceland co-operate with
the aim of changing the culture and policies of some of the major
companies operating in Reykjavik.
Return to Top
|
Child and Adolescent Health
There is some combination of a national health insurance program
and a health service. The National Health Insurance scheme offers
reimbursement for dental care for children. Primary health care
includes preventive care in health centers and home nursing. Health
promotion is also stressed.
|
Housing Benefits
Iceland has an unusually high quality of housing and extensive
housing subsidies. ing and extensive housing subsidies.
Return to Top
|
Youth
Youth aged 18-20, at school or vocational training, may receive
a monthly cash benefit if parents are deceased or receiving old
age or disability pension.
|
References
European Commission. (2002). Family benefits and family policies
in Europe. European Observatory on the Social Situation, Demography,
and Family.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/eoss/index_en.html.
Eydal, G. B., & Olafsson, S. (2003). Social and Family Policy:
The Case of Iceland. Reykjavik, Iceland: Faculty of Social Sciences,
University of Iceland.
Mutual Information System on Social Protection in the European
Union (MISSOC) (2003). Mutual
Information System on Social Protection in the Member States of
the European Union.
Nordic Social-Statistical Committee. (2001). Social protection
in the Nordic countries, 1999. Copenhagen: NOSOSCO.
Research Liaison Office of the University of Iceland. See website
at: http://www.rthj.hi.is/
Social Security Administration (2004). Social security programs
throughout the world Europe, 2004. Washington D.C.: Government Printing
Office.
|
Notes
1. "Parliamentary Resolution on the Creation of a Public Family
Policy", 1997.
2. Social Protection in the Nordic Countries, 1999, 2001.
Return to Top
|
Contacts
Washington Embassy
- Washington Embassy
- Embassy of Iceland
- 1156 15th St., NW, #1200
- Washington, DC 20005
- Phone: (202) 265-6653
- Fax: (202) 265-6656
Ministry
- Ministry of Social Affairs
- Felagsmalaraouneytio
- Hafnarhusinu vio Tryggvagotu, 4 haeo
- 150 Reykjavik
- Iceland
- Phone: 354 560-9100
- Fax: 354 552-4808
- Email: postur@fel.stjr.is
- Website: www.stjr.is/fe
- The State Social Security Institute
- Tryggingastofnun Rikissins
- Laugarvegi 114
- 105 Reykjvik
- Iceland
- Phone: 354 560-4400
- Fax: 354 562-6300
- Website: www.tr.is
|
|
|
|
|
|