The Clearinghouse on International Developments in Child, Youth and Family Policies

at COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY

Denmark

(last updated October 2001)

Introduction and Overview

Denmark does not have an explicit family policy and there is no one overall family policy statement. Denmark--among the child and family policy leaders in the OECD world--is a proto-typical Nordic welfare state: developed and supported historically by a strong labor union and Social Democratic party alliance (and sustained under political change), universal, with generous and comprehensive policies, and "with support for transfers between generations. It is also a gender friendly welfare state…giving both sexes opportunities and possibilities of combining work and family life by [a] very extensive coverage with services"(1).

While state and "social partners" (business and labor) share a consensus social contract and take the lead on labor-market matters, the municipality (275 local authorities) is the locus of a decentralized system of service delivery, including fields dealt with elsewhere nationally. Thus the municipalities are the paymasters for many cash benefits, but not family allowances, which are administered by the ministry of taxation. As is the case in Sweden, Denmark has one of the highest rates of social expenditure as a proportion of GDP in the OECD world, assigns 6 percent of GDP to child and family benefits and services, and is also unusual, sharing with other Nordic countries the dedication of as much or more money for services (especially child care) as for family cash benefits.

While the economic situation of the late 1980s and early 1990s threatened program financing and resulted in what Americans would consider very modest family and child policy cutbacks, Denmark's mid-1990 economic recovery was followed by a restoration of cuts and further positive developments(2).

1995 Eurostat education statistics show Denmark with a (comparatively) excellent record in the percent of the population with more than a lower secondary education. As a result, "the country now has the most educated workforce in the EU." Much attention is given to vocational education and training and to student drop-outs.(3)

Return to Top

 

Highlights

Click here to view or print country highlights in pdf format.

Return to Top

 

Government Agencies

Responsibility for child and family policies is spread among a number of functional ministries, but in recent years a coordinating Inter-Ministerial Committee on Children has been striving for coherence and a holistic orientation to families. There is also a coordinating policy mechanism in the Parliament. Municipal social service departments with multi-disciplinary staffs do not compartmentalize broad-based universal developmental services and those for children and youth in trouble or at risk. Family Allowances are the responsibility of the Ministry of Taxation, health care and health visitors are under the Minister of Health, and child care is under the Minister of Social Affairs and the Minister of Education. Cash maternity benefits also are under "social affairs" but other aspects are under health. Other family cash aid is under social affairs.

A Child Council (permanent since 1998) has a "watchdog" role, fosters genuine child "participation" as feasible in personal and program choice, and assesses the conditions of children in the light of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child.

 

Return to Top

 

Demographic and Other Social Trends

With its population of some 5.3 million (1998), Denmark (like all Nordic countries) is one of Europe's smallest. About 17.6 percent of the population are under-15s, a bit below the EU proportions. In 1999, 73.5 percent of all women 16-66 were in the labor force. They constitute 46% of the labor force, a number exceeded only by Finland. In 1996, 92% of mothers and 96% of fathers were in the labor force. Of women ages 30-50, 86% worked full time. Almost one quarter of all women in the labor force (below the EU average) were part-time workers, but on average fathers worked 42 hours and mothers 36 hours weekly (1996). High divorce and separation rates and socially-acceptable cohabitation give Denmark high lone parent totals, depending on definition. Most young children in fact live with two adults.

Denmark follows Finland in the lead in the age (under 21) at which half of all young people have left the parental home according to the EU 2001 report. Denmark and Finland lead in the percentage of young people ages 16-29 who are cohabitating (over 40%).(4)

 

Social Protection

The context is that of a generous Scandinavian welfare state which evolved during the period when Bismark was developing social insurance in Germany, but was based in the peasantry and an enlightened mercantile class. It has emphasized universalism, rather than contributory benefits-but the pattern is not pure. (There have been some departures from universalism in recent years). Nonetheless, most benefits are flat rate. Danish unemployment insurance has been generous, but its labor market policies have not been dramatically "active" in the Swedish sense. A general national health service covers everyone and has no "insurance" (contributory) features. The national health service involves a publicly funded and administered delivery system. Co-payments are low. Social assistance has been generous, comparatively, since the 1970's, offering a living standard that is viable. While overall housing policy is modest by European norms and there is considerable reliance on the market in this field, grants to the poor-which are means tested-are graduated and contribute substantially to a decent housing standard for most low-income families with children. Education on all levels is public, universal, of high quality, and accessible.

Denmark social expenditures as a portion of GDP are high comparatively (33.6 percent, compared to a European average of 28.7 in 1996). A Eurostat analysis for 1999 found that in standardized ECU's, adjusted by PPP, the average European country spent 5120 ECU's per head for social programs. Denmark (6884) led Germany (6351), Sweden (6119), France (5608), and U.K. (4839). Moreover it assigned 12.0 percent of those expenditures to family and child benefits, more than Sweden (11.2) and far more than the other listed countries. (These results are consistent with ranks on per capita GDP.)

According to a report from the Unicef Innocenti Center, Denmark ranks 7th among 19 OECD countries in per capita GDP, but it is third in a ranking of lowest child poverty, employing a U.S. poverty line. It has the 6th best record (5.1 percent) in poverty by the European standard of less than 50 percent of the median. The comparable U.S. rate is 22.4 percent. Some 13.8 lone parent Danish families (15.2 percent of all children) are poor by this standard, compared with 3.6 percent of other families(5). An EU 2001 report notes that Denmark like Ireland, Netherlands, and Luxembourg has one of the best performances in going from high pre-transfer poverty to low post-transfer poverty (relative). Only 49% of children under 16 live in poverty.(6)

In accord with a universalism philosophy, Danish social benefits are not based on social security contributions by employers or employees. The Danish welfare state is financed by the VAT and the individual income tax (and it is individual, providing for equal treatment of different family types).

A Danish expert notes that despite divorce and considerable non-marital cohabitation, once a child is 6 months to a year old, "the daily life of the average Danish family with children….is a daily life with two parents who are both active in the labor market"(7). This does not occur without societal support. She adds,

"Emphasis on the individual has resulted in special attention being given to children and to families with children. This direction of family policy has become increasingly visible over the last ten years, assuming a shape which makes it possible to speak of Danish family policy in terms of a focus on child policy, in spite of extensive quantitative (economic benefits) and qualitative (support of parents' care taking functions) services"(8).

Danish institutions show much interest in ensuring each child "a good childhood" and optimum personal growth and development as well as (more recently) in early acquisition of needed knowledge and skills. The children's rights message of the Universal Declaration of Children's Rights is taken very seriously. A strong group supports the concept of childhood as a stage in itself, needing to be protected and enhanced and not only as a precursor to something later. And the combination of policies and services means that Denmark has virtually no child poverty or homelessness and that Danish health records are outstanding.

Return to Top

 

Child, Youth and Family Policies

Maternity, Paternity, Parental, and Family Leaves

"Denmark has a 28-week paid and job protected maternity leave of which 2 weeks can be used before expected birth. Ten weeks of the post childbirth leave are available to either parent and an additional four weeks can be taken only by fathers. The cash benefit provided while on leave is equal to about 60 percent of prior wages (up to a maximum), but most employers top this off, so that in effect most working parents receive their full wage while on leave (Moss and Devin, 1999). In addition, a supplementary one-year parental (or child care) leave was enacted in 1992, paid through the unemployment benefit system at the rate of 60 percent of the maximum unemployment benefit (now 90 percent, authors). The first 6 months are a guaranteed right and the second has to be in agreement with the employer. Nonetheless, in effect, working parents now have between 1 1/2 and 2 years paid leave following childbirth"(9).

Denmark does not match those countries with generous benefits permitting care of a sick child. There is no statutory right to such leave, but all public sector and most private sector workers have the right through workplace policies to remain at home with full pay for the first day of a child's illness. What apparently occurs is that the mother remains at home the first day, the grandmother the second, perhaps the father on the third. Then the mother, if needed, will report in sick and use her own sick days for sick child care. This is regarded by some child advocates as an area requiring attention.

On the other hand, a 1990 amendment to Denmark's Social Security Act makes it possible for a parent to stop work to care for a seriously ill child under age 14. The income replacement corresponds to what the parent would have been entitled to as a sickness benefit and may cover fifty-two weeks over eighteen calendar months.

Return to Top

 

Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC)

As is common in Europe, most children ages 3-5 in Denmark are in pre-school programs. In addition, however, with almost all mothers of young children in the labor force, as are almost all parents in two-adult families, Denmark has been leading Europe in infant and toddler care. (64 percent of those aged 6 months-2 then 91 percent of the 3-5's in 1999).

"Child care quality declined somewhat in the early 1990's, albeit from an exceptionally high baseline (lower staff: child ratios, larger groups) but there is a beginning return to earlier standards and conviction that quality matters and should be sustained. Given earlier economic problems, it is understandable that the first priority has been to assure a full supply of places for all children with employed parents or with special needs. The basic guarantee has been largely met, but there are some shortages in care during irregular or unusual hours (at night; during weekends). Apart from filling these needs, the current intention on the part of the Ministry, is to extend coverage to the children of unemployed and at-home parents who wish their children to participate. As essential as child care/preschool is if women with young children are to be in the labor force, there is growing conviction that these programs are important for all children whatever their parents' employment status"(10). Danish child policy values childhood as an important stage as of itself and children as social actors while all the various ECEC programs are designed to contribute to a "safe and secure childhood", great value is placed on enabling children to "share the responsibility for their own daily life depending on their age and developmental stage".(11)

Denmark was part of a 2000 OECD review of ECEC in twelve countries. Consult the full Danish report on line or download it at: http://www1.oecd.org/els/pdfs/EDSECECDOCA015.pdf

Return to Top

 

Family Allowances

After some experimentation with shifts to means-testing its benefits and other benefit variations from the 1950s through the 1980s, Denmark has restored its universal approach, convinced of its rightness for child policy. The allowances, which are higher for the 0-2s than for the 3-6s, and higher for the latter than for the 7-17s are relatively generous by European standards. They are untaxed. They affect poverty rates modestly. There are also important untaxed supplements: for a child in a one-parent household or in a two parent household where one has had long hospitalization; if the allowance is the sole source of income of a single custodial parent; for orphans who have lost both parents. There are special multiple-birth allowances until age 7. There also is an adoption allowance.

Return to Top

 

Child and Family Tax Benefits

Danish taxes focus on the individual with earnings or other income. Family structure has no significance. There are no special family tax deductions. A European Commission report in the early 1990s, stated that Denmark uses its tax system for family policy less than any country in the Community.

 

Child Support

When non-custodial parents fail to pay assigned child support or pay it late, the local social welfare office advances the payment. The typical grant level was about four percent of an average annual wage in the mid-1990's and went to about 15 percent of children. They are separate from child allowances. Payments are in advance, semi-annual, and continue to age 18. There payments are not considered as social assistance, nor do they count as income if there is an application for social assistance or a means-tested rent subsidy.

Other Child Conditioned Income Transfers

See family allowances regarding survivor benefits. Also adoption allowances and social assistance. Special benefit to help keep a disabled child at home.

 

Child and Adolescent Health

Denmark's maternal and child health program has long been considered an exemplar. Apart from the excellent infant mortality, maternal mortality, and morbidity results-much of which is attributed to a generally progressive social policy and the related standard of living-the program has been seen as the nucleus of a family supportive health and social service effort, geared to case finding and early intervention.

All Danish medical care is a public service, financed by the tax system, not differentiated by income. Families choose their primary physician and may make a change once in six months. Referrals to specialists are available. From the time of birth notification, home health visiting, routine check-ups until the child is 6, an innoculation schedule, and a pattern of parent education and support combine in an exemplar program. Children are monitored and served by a municipality-based health system, closely integrated with the personal social services. The same service works closely with the child care facilities. Every child to the end of school has a health "passport". When compulsory school begins (6/7), the school health service takes over. The patterns and frequencies are adapted to family circumstances and needs. The nurses, who are well-trained, continue with annual sight and hearing tests and health education through the school years. The health care system includes dental care to age 18. Adolescents have comparably comprehensive service.

 

School-Aged Children: Policies and Programs

Education is compulsory between ages 7-16, and almost all children attend a one-year pre-school in a system which seeks to integrate ECEC and early elementary philosophies and experience.

A Danish expert provides a report on provision and participation.

"After school hours many children will go to a public after-school centre for 6-9 year-old children or a school based recreation scheme for the same age group. 60 per cent of all 6-9 year-old children are registered in such a public day-care facility. The local authorities must also provide the necessary club and other socio-educational leisure time facilities for children from the age of 10 and for young people. Clubs are social and cultural leisure-time services for the age group who no longer need to be looked after. The most common forms are after-school clubs for 10-14 year-olds in the afternoon and youth clubs for the 14-18 year-olds in the evening. The local authorities are required to draw up aims and frameworks for club activities, in order to provide a variety of good stimulating leisure-time facilities. The aim of the social club legislation is particularly to ensure that the needs of vulnerable groups are also looked after and met.

"In addition to public services a large variety of leisure activities are made use of by schoolchildren. More than 80 per cent of children aged 7-15 years participate in some kind of scheduled leisure activity i.e. sports, scouts, music etc. More than two thirds do sports of some kind and one fifth sing or play an instrument…"(12).

Return to Top

 

Youth

The income transfer and education benefit systems are seen as covering youth allowances to 18, youth clubs, children's institutions, railroad travel to holiday camps, and a 50/50 mix of education allowances and loans for those who continue post-grade 10 education (usually age 16). As put by one Danish expert:

"Local authorities are also obliged to supply the necessary number of places in youth centres or other necessary support measures for older children and adolescents. A new act that came into effect on 1 July 1995 stipulates that youth centres should always be part of a local authority's general child/youth policy measures"(13).

Current rules give young people a statutory right to influence planning and operation of these programs- and to express themselves on matters affecting their own welfare.

Click here to view in pdf format a table on the Ages at which children are legally entitled to carry out a series of acts in European Union countries. See Youth Policies section for definition of terms used.

Return to Top

 

Housing Benefits

In general, families with children have adequate housing, 80 percent in private houses and 20 percent in apartments. The local social service authorities are charged with helping families with children "if they have problems with housing, and provisions are available for subsidizing the rent if necessary." At the end of 1998 some 83,000 households with children received housing allowances. Homeless families with children "are practically unknown in Denmark." Almost all live in homes with indoor plumbing and central heating. Some 0.6 percent lack indoor toilets(14).

 

References

Peter Baldwin, The Politics of Social Solidarity. (Cambridge University Press, 1994).

Danish Ministries of Social Affairs and Education, Early Childhood Education and Care Policy in Denmark (OECD Thematic Review Series) Copenhagen, 2000.

Eurostat, The Social Situation in the European Union, 2001 (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2001).

Torben Fridberg, "Denmark", in John Ditch, et al., eds. Developments in National Family Policies in 1996 (Brussels: European Commission, 1998).

Bent Greve, The Changing Universal Welfare Model: the Case of Denmark Towards the 21st Century. (Denmark: Roskilde University, 1999).

Linda Haas and P. Hwang, "Parental leave in Sweden," in Parental Leave: Progress or Pitfall?, edited by Peter Moss and Fred Deven (Netherlands: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, 1999).

Innocenti Report Card, Issue No. 1, June, 2000. (Florence: Unicef International Child Development Centre).

Alfred J. Kahn and Sheila B. Kamerman, Social Policy and the Under-3s: Six Country Case Studies. (New York: Columbia University School of Social Work, 1994).

Sheila B. Kamerman and Alfred J. Kahn, "Child and Family Policies in an Era of Social Policy Retrenchment and Restructuring." In K. Vleminckx and Tim Smeeding, editors. Child Well-Being in Modern Nations. (Bristol, Eng.: The Policy Press, 2000, forthcoming).

Sheila B. Kamerman and Alfred J. Kahn, Starting Right: How America Neglects its Youngest Children and What We Can Do About it. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Daniel Levine, Poverty and Society. (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1988).

Ministry of Social Affairs, Child and Family Policies (Copenhagen: 1997).

Vita Bering-Pruzan, "Denmark" in John Ditch, Helen Barnes, and Jonathan Bradshaw, editors, Developments in National Family Policies in 1996. (Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 1998), pp. 15-36.

Vita Pruzan, "Family Policy in Denmark: Towards Individuation and a Symmetrical Family Structure," in Wilfried Dumon, editor, Changing Family Policies in the Member States of the European Union. (Brussels: European Commission, 1995), pp. 35-55.

Tine Rostgaard, M. N. Christoffersen, & H. Weise, "Parental leave in Denmark, in Parental Leave: Progress or Pitfall?, edited by Peter Moss and Fred Deven (Netherlands: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, 1999).

 

Notes

  1. Greve, p.9.
  2. Kamerman and Kahn in Vleminckx and Smeeding.
  3. Eurostat, 1995
  4. Eurostat, 2001
  5. Innocenti Report Card, figures 1,2,3.
  6. Eurostat, 2001
  7. Pruzan, 1996, p.15.
  8. Pruzan, 1995, pp. 35-36.
  9. See note 2, p. 507 in Moss and Deven.
  10. Ibid..
  11. Fridberg, 1998, p. 31.
  12. Fridberg, 1998, p.33.
  13. Pruzan, 1996, p.19.

Return to Top

Contacts

Washington Embassy

Embassy of Denmark
3200 Whitehaven St., NW
Washington, DC 20008
Phone: (202) 234-4300
Fax: (202) 328-1470


Ministry
Mrs. Grete Hansen
Deputy Head of Division International Affairs
Ministry of Social Affairs
Homens Kanal 22
1060 Copenhagen K
Phone: 45 (33) 92 93 40
Fax: 45 (33) 92 93 36
Email: dpgrh@sm.dk
Mrs. Grethe Fenger Moller

Department Ministry of Social Affairs
Holmens Kanal 22
1060 Copenhagen K
Email: dpgfm@sm.dk

European Union Family Observatory National Representative
Jens Bonke
Social Forsknings Instituttet
Herluf Trolles Gade 11
DK-1052 Copenhagen
Phone:45-33-48 08 86
Fax: 45-33-48 08 33
Email: jeb@sfi.dk
Website: http://www.sfi.dk

 

 

Introduction and Overview

Highlights

Government Agencies

Demographic and Other Social Trends

Social Protection

Maternity, Paternity,Parental, and Family Leaves

Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC)

Family Allowances

Child and Family Tax Benefits
Child Support
Other Child-Conditioned Income Transfers
Child and Adolescent Health
School-Aged Children: Policies and Programs
Youth
Housing Benefits

 

 

Return to Top